Verified Document

K-12 Teachers Performance Appraisal Model Term Paper

In the event the appeal is denied and the evaluation demonstrates that the teacher has deficiencies in one or more areas it will be necessary to recommend measures to resolve the negative performance issues. If the matter is related to performance abilities or skills, appropriate training and mentoring may be recommended; with a follow up mid year evaluation recommended six months from the date of completion of the initial review.

If the performance evaluation is unsatisfactory due to issues of attendance or other personal matters, the evaluatee will be observed for the next three months and given the opportunity to resolve any unsatisfactory issues. At this point in time the evaluatee may request a mini review of performance the results of which will be documented and added...

It is the intent of the school District to provide all teachers with the tools necessary to excel in the workplace. The District is committed to doing everything possible to enhance the outcome and performance of all staff members in the K-12 environment.
In the event of an unsatisfactory performance review, the District will offer mentoring assistance to teachers to help improve their performance. Objectives will be re-evaluated with emphasis on improving performance and attaining a higher level of proficiency.

References

Article X: Evaluation Procedures."

Sources used in this document:
References

Article X: Evaluation Procedures."
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now